Define Appertaining To Books R.U.R.

Title	:	R.U.R.
Author	:	Karel Čapek
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Dover Thrift Editions
Pages	:	Pages: 58 pages
Published	:	August 20th 2001 by Dover Publications, Inc. (first published 1920)
Categories	:	Science Fiction. Plays. Classics. Fiction. Drama. European Literature. Czech Literature

R.U.R. Paperback | Pages: 58 pages

Relation During Books R.U.R.

R.U.R.--written in 1920--garnered worldwide acclaim for its author and popularized the word "Robot." Mass-produced, efficient and servile labor, Čapek's Robots remember everything, but lack creative thought, and the Utopian life they provide ultimately lacks meaning. When the Robots revolt, killing all but one of their masters, they must attempt to learn the secret of self-duplication. But their attempts at replication leave them with nothing but bloody chunks of meat. It's not until two robots fall in love and are christened "Adam" and "Eve" by the last surviving human that Nature emerges triumphant.

Itemize Books In Favor Of R.U.R.

Original Title:	R.U.R.
ISBN:	0486419266 (ISBN13: 9780486419268)
Edition Language:	English
Characters:	Primus, Domin, Helena Glory, Sulla (robot)

Rating Appertaining To Books R.U.R.

Ratings: 3.87 From 7741 Users | 549 Reviews

Column Appertaining To Books R.U.R.

Humanoid robots are created to ease the burden of work for humanity, but the story doesn't end there.Play Review: R.U.R. is parenthetically titled Rossum's Universal Robots, and this year will be a century old. Which means we need to place it in time to discuss it in context. In 1920 industrialization was king. The telephone, automobile, radio, and airplanes were new technology. Factories and the assembly line were also new, which led to a hellish vision of the future for workers. Were humans to

I listened to this as a play instead of just reading the script. Even though this was written in the 1920's many of the themes still resonate today.And be warned, this was written before Asimov wrote his rules for robots.

R.U.R. (Rossums Universal Robots) by Karel Capek is an interesting read. It is a Sci-fi play. This story was completely new to me. I didnt know who came up with robots but now I know. This is the first Sci-fi story with the word Robot. The world of Sci-fi can thank this man for bringing Robots into the world. So, Karel, thank you! Old Rossum, a mad scientist, wanted to be a substitute for God and decided to make man, but years came and went and nothing happened. No life. Young Rossum decided he

This short play is primarily of historical interest, since the story is (now) very familiar and the characterization is quite meager. The play is additionally hampered by a poor translation. I read two different editions of the play, both crediting the same translator, but found stark differences between them. The version pictured here seems more complete, but I found several passages truncated or entirely removed from the Dover Thrift Edition (go figure).If you are at all interested in the

This is the book that introduced concept of robots. And the play seems to get a lot of things about dynamics involved right too, and surprisingly right. It is criticism of result and productivity centered approach that seems to have taken over the world ever since industrial revolution:" From a technical point of view, the whole of childhood is quite pointless. Simply a waste of time."Or" He took a good look at the human body and he saw straight away that it was much too complicated, any good

Probably important as the prototype for the basic robot narrative, which is as follows:a) Humans manufacture slave laborers whose own needs are minimal in order to lower costs and break unions;b) Humans equip slave laborers with skills sufficient to carry out productive tasks, including heavy industrial, technical, academic, and military functions;c) Humans construct slave laborers who lack any desires of their own and are accordingly not market participants and therefore require no wages;d)

Finishing R.U.R. was a bit of a chore and gets three stars, mostly on the strength of the brief pieces of dialogue between the characters. I can see how that and that alone might work with an audience. No long soliloquies. But that is all I can appreciate about R.U.R. The play itself is muddled in different genres, and makes a grandiose point in the tritest manner for its conclusion at the end of the third act. With the Epilogue, R.U.R. tries to arrive at a more meaningful conclusion than the